requestId:68499ab1435144.01700932.
How can the true meaning of the whole body be sufficient—the incompleteness of modern historical theory and its future exploration
Author: Jay Chou
Source: Author Authorized by the Confucian Network Published
Original from “ZihaiBaobao.com Recommended by Fengfeng》2011 Issue 5
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou July 29th, Jiyou
Jesus September 19, 2017
Content summary: Now historians want to seek a certain overall history. This whole history cannot be achieved by relying on historical theory—whether it is to adhere to the old historical theory or to advance the historical theory—that it cannot be achieved by relying on materialistic or idealistic historical viewing. Oriental contemporary science and technology philosophy such as STS intrinsic theory also does not help in solving this problem. On the contrary, China’s traditional thinking method of unity between man and nature is helpful to the study of this problem.
Keywords: Overall history; historical theory; dual thinking
In recent years, it has been in various historical theories seminars. We hear more and more a call: writing a whole history. Moreover, the scope of this entire history has been constantly expanding, and it is no longer limited to human beings’ own history, and it intends to expand to natural history and even the history of the entire universe. The two divisions of traditional history and nature can no longer meet the needs of historians. Historians began to seek ways and ways to understand the overall history. It is precisely in the process of revising the overall history that historical students suffer from theoretical dilemma. Some ask for help from the historical theory, while others rely on traditional materialism and idealistic historical view. In the eyes of the writer, these historical theories inherited from the East cannot properly solve this problem. On the contrary, China’s traditional thinking methods and concepts help to advance and explore this problem.
1. The infinite evil and delusion of historical theory
In the issue of the connotation of overall history, whether it is an Eastern historical theory task or a Chinese historical theory task, they will eventually admit this, that is, overall history is the integration of time history and space history.
This view is deeply influenced by Eastern modern thinking, that is, historical theory. In the Oriental modern thinking, time and space have become unreversible particle flows, and the whole of history is the integration of time history and space history, and the truth of history is also closely linked to the whole of history. This historical tendency is most obvious in both objective and practical history. Lanke was ambitious to write a history for each ethnic group. [1]24~25 The history of time and space includes both the history of materialization and the history of energy. In other words, what people think of history in modern times has become time-lapse. The time here is a time that is irreversible. Not only this way, in the time of inconsistent thinking, people have received the concept of evolution. Under the influence of these two thoughts, history has become a history of progressing and continuous evolution. [2]90～97
Under this kind of music view, the historians believed that the overall history and its reality were reachable, but this kind of music was quickly hit because such a whole was not reachable. Because in the undesirable space, people will never be able to experience the historical details in the space. History in time and space can be infinitely divided. In the sea of infinite details of history, a little bit will make complete history impossible, and history is truly based on the complete foundation of history. Under such historical concepts, the complete history of history is bound to be impossible. Soon, whether it is a historian who studies the history of things or a history of thought, it is said that returning to history is ineffective, and it is impossible to fully and truly understand the predecessors. Since the history discussed by each generation cannot be complete and true, what people talk about masturbating is: we can achieve the truth of the department. It was inspired by this concept that people invested in the vast historical data. In this way, history discussions will inevitably become a study of whether it is a constant discovery of cultural relics, or a constant interpretation of text, or a combination of two. But after a detailed analysis, we will see that the real ability of the department is also a fantasy. If we draw the ultimate understanding of historical theory, we will find that this department is really unreliable. Because the true judgment is still made by people, since all history has dissipated in time and people cannot return to the past, the truth of the judgment is questionable. The difficulty of truth (regardless of all or departmental) is the biggest problem faced by historians under a space-based conception. Therefore, some people simply refuse to accept itThe confusion of history is to regard history as the history of the main interpretation, that is, history only exists in the researcher’s explanation. This is the benefiting the meaning concept to be expressed by Gadamer’s singular science and Foucault’s intellectual archaeology. According to their theory, history is really unknown. We only have historical texts, and this text will be reflected by each generation based on its unique landscape. [3]384~385 is no longer far from practical theory history. The masterpiece “The Intellectual Knowledge of Chapter 1” by japan (Japanese) student Hakuka Yamaguchi is discussed with theories of the study. He is no longer interested in the real Chapter 1, he only wants the intellectual in his heart. [4]1~2 It is hard to say that the japanese (Japanese) Chinese studies are “no Chinese studies without China.” [5] And this kind of subjective tendency is expanding in the domestic academic community.
Whether it is objective history or archaeological history, we can call it a historical theory. These two seemingly opposite directions have similar conditions, that is, they cannot be respected against time and space. We can call the former as a preservation of the old historical doctrine, and the latter as a progressive historical doctrine. The difference between the two is that the former emphasizes the continuity and unity of time and space flow, while the latter emphasizes its cracking and difference. In other words, even if the historical theory is to hinder the continuous and evolving historical flow of the old historical theory, the result is to push the historical theory more thoroughly. If we say that keeping the old historical theory is to turn every era and every individual into a part of the time flow, all we do is to transform every moment and every individual. And these two people do not conflict with each other. The two historical theories are ultimately family.
In the eyes of the writer, no matter whether it is to keep the old or the rapid historical theory, it is impossible to find the whole of history. In terms of the old historical theory, this whole body cannot stand up because its opening and ending cannot be sought; and the history of its erecting is just a gathering or sticking of things, or it can be said to be an infinite amount of burden. This bonding is not a real whole. The true meaning of the whole should be the content label: the combination of heaven, the elite of the industry, the sweet article, the love after marriage is one, or perhaps it is not only a quantity but also a quality whole. The perfect combination of quality and quantity is the true meaning of the whole. In this whole, the infinity of quantity is driven by quality, and the meaning of the whole is importantly given by quality rather than quantity. The combination with quality makes the quantity no longer a particle flow, but a mass of the whole complex, and this whole body can beThe infinite extension of the amount of the corruption becomes the real whole body.
And for the radical historical theory, pursuing history as a whole is self-deprecating. It has rejected the historical objectivity and regarded the historical subjective view as ultimate truth. [6]170
So, in a space, whether it is to emphasize the sticking or the absolute uniformity of the historical fragments, it will not produce a real whole. This implies that the overall energy of history is a combination of time and space and super time and space. In fact, the historical logic has not been fully implemented by historians. Because historians (including Lank) always want to seek things beyond time and space in time and space, that is, meaning. [1]25, 27 Even the historical works of fragmentation and evacuation of postmoderns, such as Foucault and Delhida, did not give up on their intentions. What is even more contradictory is that the historical theory itself is a value or meaning demand, and it wants to set itself as a broad value standard. In this sense, the true historical theory seems to be impossible. The meaning and root of the history of time and space must be outside time and space. Only when we reach the source of time and space can we 官网口网口网口网站口网站站口网站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站
It is
發佈留言